Sunday, January 29, 2006

AAA Power Rankings Week 8

Last Updated Jan 29, 2006

Will update this on a weekly basis, most likely every Sun. Think your team should be higher, or included in the Power Rankings?? Send me an take at BCSportsFanatic@yahoo.ca

01. Saint George's Saints (1)
02. Handsworth Royals (2)
03. Kitsilano Blue Demons (3)
04. Claremont Spartans (5)
05. Centennial Centaurs (4)
06. Brookswood Bobcats (7)
07. Dover Bay Dolphins (6)
08. GP Vanier Towhees (8)
09. WRCA Warriors (9)
10. Enver Creek Cougars (10)
11. Oak Bay Bays (HM)
12. Maple Ridge Ramblers (12)
13. Gleneagle Talons (13)
14. Killarney Cougars (14)
15. Pitt Meadows Marauders (11)

HM: MEI, West Vancouver, Wellington, Churchill, Magee, Cowichan, Kelowna

Top 5 don't change, moved Brookswood up 1 spot. Moved Oak Bay back into the top 15 at #11. Moved Pitt back 4 spots to #15. Added West Vancouver, and Magee as HM. So far the top teams are looking like the top teams and the others are filling in the top 15 nicely. With the exception of St. George's and Handsworth, any team can beat anyone else on any given night.

Week 7 Power Rankings
Week 6 Power Rankings
Week 5 Power Rankings
Week 4 Power Rankings
Week 3 Power Rankings
Week 2 Power Rankings
Week 1 Power Rankings
Pre-season Week 2 Power Rankings
Pre-season Week 1 Power Rankings

27 Comments:

At 7:19 PM, January 29, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

why is brookswood ahead of oak bay... oak bay beat them easily by 20+ points this weekend, and thats the second time this year. Then oak bay gets robbed by handsworth and loses by 1.

 
At 9:54 PM, January 29, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

why is Killarny Ranked? They lost to Siggi Skagfield (aka Cedar)!!

 
At 10:49 PM, January 29, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yes, myself am wondering why brookswood is moving up when all they have done is lost?, loosing to handsworth by 2, though i hear reffing was a factor in the close game, loosing to oak bay by 20, the second loss to oak bay this season, the first by 15 or so, and finally on the same weekend, loosing to claremont by 10, not to say they shouldnt be ranked, but being beaten continously by high ranked teams, and teams you've placed in HM numberous times does not merit a better ranking.....until Brookswood begins to play better, they should be at the most 10th

 
At 7:15 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow. Magee..................wow.

 
At 7:31 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

where the hell did fleetwood go?
They beat enver by about 10 and lost to qe without some starters.. they are definitely in the mix..yah why is brookswood moving up?

 
At 7:34 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

where the hell did fleetwood go?
They beat enver by about 10 and lost to qe without some starters.. they are definitely in the mix..yah why is brookswood moving up?

 
At 8:36 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

your wrong about saying "With the exception of St. George's and Handsworth, any team can beat anyone else on any given night" ... handsworth showed that tehy are not invincible, only beating oak bay by 1, and taking double over time to beat claremont. also, brookswood is no better than 10th, and probably should be around 12-14th.

 
At 10:31 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

central MURDERED haritage park 86-39

 
At 10:39 PM, January 30, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

soo what..?

 
At 12:27 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

brookswood = overated
who have they beaten that are legit

 
At 1:40 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

they beat centennial

 
At 2:22 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

doesn't matter if they beat centennial, they've lost way too many games to mediocre teams to be ranked that high. their guards are garbage and as a team they are way too inconsistent to be top 10. You should re-adjust those rankings and put brookswood out of the top ten.

 
At 9:41 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oak bay over Claremont by 10+ tonight in league game.

 
At 9:54 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes they did, very impressive. Oak Bay was lights-out all game, Rushton was amazing, must of had over 30. Also Cummings was clutch. I thought Claremont would win FOR SURE, but the Oak Bay team looked clearly like the better team tonight.

 
At 10:47 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

VC beat saints!?!?!?!

 
At 10:51 PM, January 31, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

nvm, friend was bullshitting me, Saints won by over 40 i think

 
At 7:25 AM, February 01, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tuesday Jan 31
Pitt 62 -- Centennial 57
Pitt was up by 15-20 most of the game.

 
At 8:05 PM, February 01, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

central MURDERED haritage park 86-39

who cares haritage is a ****ty AA team

 
At 10:19 PM, February 01, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

centrals problem is that they dont have enough guys committed...people show up to practices and games whenever they feel....and most of the good players dont play because of that...they need more committed players

 
At 2:48 PM, February 02, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pitt has an impressive win over Cents. Cents play poorly? Did Pitt have their other big guy back? Did they shoot lights out? Howd Gatner fair?

Fill us in those in the know

 
At 2:57 PM, February 02, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

pitts big guy is never coming back

 
At 6:28 PM, February 03, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

no more like centennial shot the ball horrible..

started the game 0 for 19 played good only in the 4th Q.. were down 24 made it a 2 point game

 
At 12:57 PM, February 05, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can someone please tell where the berths are going this year?

 
At 2:02 AM, February 11, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

pinetree beat fox and glenn eagle tonight, where are they in the rankings

 
At 2:08 PM, February 16, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree that Brookswood is way over rated mainly because of Brent Malish, they lost to Dover Bay 2 or 3 times by more than 20pts! Why do you continue to keep them so high in the rankings?

 
At 2:13 PM, February 16, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree brookswood is way to over rated with Brent Malish, he cannot carry a team he is great sure, but he does not play any defense, he is a pure scorer thats all, he gets 40 his check gets 40! The lost to dover 2 or 3 times by 20 or more! They are way to high in your rankings!

 
At 2:13 PM, February 16, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let the road to the Provincials start!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home